A Republican MP on Monday launched impeachment proceedings against the controversial American Minister of Defense, Pete Hegseth, weakened by the Democratic breakthrough in the midterms. It should be put to a vote this week in the House of Representatives.

Published on: 09/11/2026 - 21:28

An indictment procedure against the American Minister of Defense, Pete Hegseth, was launched on Monday, November 9 in Congress by a Republican deputy, who denounces in particular the war in Iran and the way in which this minister of Donald Trump led it.

“Minister Hegseth acted in a manner contrary to the trust placed in him as Minister of Defense (...), to the great harm of the cause of law and justice, and to the manifest detriment of the people of the United States of America,” declared MP Thomas Massie, a frequent critic of the Republican president, announcing from the hemicycle to launch this “impeachment” procedure, which however has little chance of leading to dismissal.

In his resolution, the elected representative from Kentucky accuses the minister of having broken the law by waging war against Iran without having obtained authorization from Congress. He further accuses him of having "ignored the laws which minimize the number of civilian victims", particularly highlighting the bombing of a primary school in Minab, in the south of Iran, which cost the lives of 120 children in the first hours of the conflict.

Pete Hegseth is also singled out for “extrajudicial executions”. Under his leadership, the US military carried out strikes against drug trafficking boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific, a campaign particularly criticized under international law.

A two-thirds majority needed in the Senate

Thomas Massie also denounces "the kidnapping of a sovereign foreign leader", with the capture of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro in January.

Despite their large defeat in last week's midterm elections, Republicans have a majority in both houses of Congress until January. The indictment of the head of the Pentagon should be put to a vote this week in the House of Representatives, where it could well be adopted due to the opposition to the minister from certain Republican deputies, as well as a problem of absenteeism in their ranks for the weeks to come.

Also (re)readMidterms: the Republican defeat weakens the future of Pete Hegseth at the Pentagon

Pete Hegseth would then be formally “impeached”, but not yet removed from office. Because a trial would follow before the Senate, where a two-thirds majority vote would be necessary for impeachment.

An improbable result since the Republicans still have 53 senators out of 100. Even in January, when the newly elected officials are inaugurated, the Democrats would need around ten Republican senators to join their efforts.

Pete Hegseth defended himself vigorously on Thursday. “They attack me, they attack us, because we are effective,” he declared in a video, defending the war in Iran as a “courageous and historic” action.

The minister is due to hold a rare press conference from the Pentagon on Tuesday morning.

Hegseth “undermines national security”

Last week, Donald Trump renewed his confidence in Pete Hegseth, referring to his “very good work”. But a formal snub before Congress could force the president's hand and push him to part ways with his minister at a time when pressure is greater than ever to end the war in Iran.

If the “impeachment” procedure was launched by a Republican, the calls to hold the Minister of Defense accountable mainly come from the Democratic camp. “He is not only incompetent and corrupt, but he undermines national security and that of our military,” Democratic MP Jason Crow said last week.

Also (re)readThe “High-T” man or the new testosterone crusade of Pete Hegseth and the far right

The opposition denounces a series of scandals for the former Fox News presenter propelled to head of the Pentagon in 2025.

Recently, he announced the live broadcast of the execution by military platoon of the author of an attack against American soldiers, before being disavowed by Donald Trump.

During his first months in office, a journalist revealed that he had used a simple conversation on the Signal application to inform others responsible for upcoming military strikes in Yemen, and not secure tools dedicated to this type of ultra-sensitive information.

With AFP

Keywords associated with the article

The content you are trying to access does not exist or is no longer available.